Bux.to Sux - An Exposé about Bux.to

Well, well, well...what do we have here? This just gets better and better every day! Bux.to has turned into a international Soap Opera sensation. I have been busy and away from the "drama" at bux.to. So I check in from time to time, to see if anything changed. Of course, nothing has. Only the same old lies coming from that place.

I did find something quite amusing. As everyone knows there is a Mod on bux.to, by the name of "AMC" who desires attention from time to time. Like you would do to anyone who throws fits and tantrums, she is ignored and laughed at on several occasions. She is even the "butt of a joke" on a PRIVATE forum. A forum that she is so desperately obssessed with. All of this is very amusing to watch.

For instance, a couple of days ago a member started a thread to show people on the forum how many people have joined the other PRIVATE forum, known as the "Bagheads" forum. Of course AMC runs to it and points out that some member names are not the same and that if they are not corrected she will close the thread. Oh no!! She is going to close the thread down! ::shaking in my boots::

Also in this thread, AMC mentions she isn't really concerned about what goes on on this other forum. Only that she has been given screen shots of what is being said and done there, and she wants everyone to know that she knows everything that goes on there. LIKE WE CARE!

Let it be known that the PRIVATE forum on the Shack was made by Chrissy, Eternal and Vince (a former Bux.to Moderator) to have discussions about bux.to without the fear of being hounded and demonized by moderators and staff. you see this is what happens when you censor and piss people off. If bux.to didn't edit, delete, and close down threads they wouldn't have this problem. But no! They had to quell all of this for fear of it getting out to the public.

So back to this "Baghead List", I was going to reply today on this thread. However, AMC closed it. She does her little song and dance with Spiderwoman and acts like it is some kind of game. Yes a bunch of grown women playing games with people and their money. Sickening, isn't it?!

So since I am unable to post there, I will post it here. I think I like it better here anyways, since all eyes can see it.

Dear AMC,

Yes, we know we have people within our own forum under your thumb. And? Your point is? What concern is it to you? You keep saying you don't care...however you keep bringing it up. Obsessed much? We know you are obsessed with "Our little group". I for one could care less if you knew. The point of the "Shack" is to express ourselves freely without bux.to and their little Nazis coming around and deleting and censoring what we say. I think it is hilarious that you are now able to read what we say about you. And if I could I would say it now. But we all know what would happen to it once it is said.

However, I wouldn't doubt that those screen shots came from Alt3rna4tiv3. You know the one who admitted to hacking in to the Shacks forum and using another users name, who had nothing to do with this? I am pretty much sure that is a illegal act. An act which bux.to is associated with. Oh, and I have screen shots of that conversation where he admitted in doing this. Since you talk about screen shots.

Bux.to isn't concerned about it but they get someone to hack in to a user name and use their account to browse a private forum. Does that sound like a person who doesn't care?

You can throw around all the threats in the world. Nothing but hot air. Nothing but talk from you. I would love for you to file a claim against me. Please, reveal who you are. You think you have lawyers at your dispose? You haven't seen nothing. I want to see how you and bux.to are going to explain yourselves for what you have done. An employee from a company who is committing fraud and stealing money is going to file a suit against me? A scammer is going to sue me? Please, don't make me laugh.

See you in court my dear. Hope you have fun in Indianapolis.

And that is what I was going to post before the topic was locked. Previously AMC has been barking at other members stating that we are slandering and defaming bux.to and their staff. And what are they doing to us? Scamming us? Stealing from us? This is bux.to's Hypocrisy. When members are treated unfairly we are suppose to shut up and take it. However when the same in return is dealt, they can not handle it!

Bux.to, you have stolen, ridiculed us, and underestimated us. Bad move on your part. You want to file a claim against us? Do it! Stop wasting our time with all of your bull shit. You know you don't have a leg to stand on if you try and pursue this. Come on, show us who you are. Show us who the owner is, show us your real names. A company that is being investigated by Interpol and who is violating tax laws thinks they are victims of slander? Someone needs to go back to Law School or bux.to needs to find a new "legal department".

For those who don't know in order to file or make such a claim, they need to do it where it took place. Well, bux.to. You have your work cut out for you, because your so called "slander" claim is all over the internet from thousands of members. You can't even pay your members!

Also it is the Plaintiff who has to prove slander occurred, not the defendant.
Even if a statement is derogatory, there are circumstances in which such statements are permissible in law. Note that, due to the burden of proof, it is not initially the defendant's duty to prove these defenses; rather, it is the plaintiff's duty to prove that the defenses are invalid (i.e. the defendant does not need to prove that the statements are true; the plaintiff must prove that they are false).

Question: What defenses may be available to someone who is sued for defamation?

Answer: There are ordinarily 6 possible defenses available to a defendant who is sued for libel (published defamatory communication.)
1. Truth. This is a complete defense, but may be difficult to prove.
2. Fair comment on a matter of public interest. This defense applies to "opinion" only, as compared to a statement of fact. The defendant usually needs to prove that the opinion is honestly held and the comments were not motivated by actual "malice." ( Malice means knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth of falsity of the defamatory statement.)
3. Privilege. The privilege may be absolute or qualified. Privilege generally exists where the speaker or writer has a duty to communicate to a specific person or persons on a given occasion. In some cases the privilege is qualified and may be lost if the publication is unnecessarily wide or made with malice.
4. Consent. This is rarely available, as plaintiffs will not ordinarily agree to the publication of statements that they find offensive.
5. Innocent dissemination. In some caes a party who has no knowledge of the content of a defamatory statement may use this defense. For example, a mailman who delivers a sealed envelope containing a defamatory statement, is not legally liable for any damages that come about from the statement.
6. Plaintiff's poor reputation. Defendant can mitigate (lessen) damages for a defamatory statement by proving that the plaintiff did not have a good reputation to begin with. Defendant ordinarily can prove plaintiff's poor reputation by calling witnesses with knowledge of the plaintiff's prior reputation relating to the defamatory content.

Need I say more? How about if person's character has already been in question or tarnished. I am sure Spiderwoman's history on the internet will come into play. Her lying about her other blogs and blaming it on another. Then it was later found that the same vulgarisms was found on another forum. Which after it was exposed she went in there and changed her account, no worries we have screen shots of that too.

Or how about this one,